Home HEALTH Tribunal rules in favour of Nigerian Catholics Nurse forced to leave job...

Tribunal rules in favour of Nigerian Catholics Nurse forced to leave job in UK for wearing Cross -OsmekNews

23
0
Tribunal rules in favour of Nigerian Catholics Nurse forced to leave job in UK for wearing Cross
Tribunal rules in favour of Nigerian Catholics Nurse forced to leave job in UK for wearing Cross

A Catholic NHS nurse who was “forced out” of her job for wearing a “bacteria-harbouring” crucifix around her neck was unfairly dismissed, a tribunal has ruled.

Mary Onuoha, 61, was harassed and victimised by Croydon Health Services NHS Trust when she was told to stop wearing the cross due to an infection risk, according to the ruling.

It added that this had created a “humiliating, hostile and threatening environment” for the nurse, breaching her human rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Mrs Onuoha resigned as an NHS theatre practitioner at Croydon University Hospital in south London in June 2020 following what she described as a two-year campaign against her when she refused to remove the cross.

The tribunal found the trust had constructively dismissed Mrs Onuoha from her job of 18 years.

Employment judge Dyal and two lay members, Mrs Foster-Norman and Ms Forecast, ruled that: “Applying common sense, it is clear to us that the infection risk posed by a necklace of the sorts the claimant used to wear, when worn by a responsible clinician such as the claimant, who complied with handwashing protocol, was very low.”

They said the trust had failed to properly deal with Mrs Onuoha’s grievances when she refused to remove the cross on religious grounds.

The tribunal added: “No real thought seems to have been given to whether it was really appropriate to discipline the claimant for doing something that in fact many others in the workforce (including more senior colleagues who worked just as closely with patients) were doing unchallenged.

“Equally, no real thought was given to the claimant’s point that others were wearing religious apparel in clinical areas and that she should be treated equally to them.”

The ruling added the dress code policy was “arbitrary” and there was no clear reason why numerous items such as plain rings, ties, hijabs and turbans were allowed but crosses were not.

The tribunal described a senior manager who had interrupted a surgery while Mrs Onuoha was caring for a patient under general anaesthetic as “high-handed” and this action had created an “intimidating environment.